NZ Politics Daily - 25 October (liberation)

From the sublime to the ridiculous. That’s how one writer has characterized the quick shift the nation is experiencing in moving on from the Rugby World Cup tournament to the general election campaign (see: From one competition to another). And today really is the first day of the proper election campaign. There’s still some discussion on how Sunday night’s outcome might impact on the election. Both John Key and John Pagani seem adamant that it won’t affect things politically, and they both have they own reasons, no doubt, for pushing that line. Others, such as Gordon Campbell have been a bit more profound, arguing that ‘This close, nail biting victory – without the triumphalism that the All Blacks running riot over their opponents would have entailed – was the best possible result, politically as well’. The one-point victory in a match increasingly dominated by the French, would according to Campbell temper the benefits to the National Party, and furthermore, ‘Phil Goff will be seeing analogies in this final, and hoping for similar miracles from the underdog during his own political final, on November 26’ – see: On the Rugby World Cup Victory. But for the very best analysis of the politics of the Rugby World Cup, see Scott Yorke’s irreverent Imperator Fish blog post, Hitler Behind RWC Ball Choice. And for a more serious examination of the big-money commercial operations of ‘All Blacks Inc’ read Lane Nichols’ What an ABs win is worth.

The most intelligent analysis of the day on the election campaign comes from Massey University’s Grant Duncan writing on his Policy Matters blog – see: How did Key get away with it?. Duncan explains John Key and National’s extreme popularity by their successful attempts to position themselves – as Helen Clark once did with Labour – as ‘mainstream New Zealand’. He argues that Key has been able to ‘obliterate the class politics that used to limit their [National’s] appeal as a traditional conservative party’, but also ‘to obliterate ethnic-identity political boundaries as well’. Other very useful election campaign items today include: Tracy Watkin’s Rena grounding has left National floundering and Andrea Vance’s Our embarrassing uncle?. Also of importance is Adam Bennett’s An odds-on favourite and Marika Hill’s Political activism surge driven by students.

But the economy continues to be central to this year’s election campaign. And therefore today’s Treasury book-opening exercise will have a strong influence on the next few weeks. For the latest, see the following reports: Govt still expects surplus by 2015, Grim forecast for New Zealand's finances, and Treasury confirms Govt on track for surplus. [Continue reading below for a full list of the highlights of NZ Politics Daily]

Below are the internet links to all the NZ politics material from the last 24 hours that are either informative, insightful, interesting or influential. This list and the links are taken from a fuller document, NZ Politics Daily, which is emailed out, Monday to Friday, to various researchers, academics, journalists, MPs and so forth. The document is purely for research purposes only, and if you would like to be on the subscription list, please email: [email protected]

Election campaign kicks off

Grant Duncan (Policy Matters): How did Key get away with it?

Andrea Vance (Stuff): Our embarrassing uncle?

Colin James (ODT): After the cup, back to the election grind

Simon Collins (NZH): 26% of young voters yet to sign up as roll hits 3m for first time

Adam Bennett (NZH): Greens call for state monitoring of the media

Andrea Vance (Dom Post): Your choice: a guide to the election

Marika Hill (Stuff): Political activism surge driven by students

Tracy Watkin (Stuff): Rena grounding has left National floundering

John Hartevelt (Dom Post): Clear-cut case of the pot and the kettle

Duncan Graham (onlineopinion): Any hope after the Rugby World Cup?

Kerre Woodham (NZH): Fair marks in first-term report